My github repo (jaboweryGUTCP) see GUTCPCosmologicalModel.nb for my attempt at a Mathematica implementation of GUTCP cosmology. See also the numerous caveats given in the comment at the top. While my conclusions differ from those given in the book, the caveats should be more than adequate to demonstrate my intent is not to "debunk" GUTCP. Consider my effort a kind of "proof reading" by someone who may in fact not be qualified. But, in my own defense, AFAIK, this is the only publicly available review of GUTCP cosmology in a form that can be easily checked by anyone. Prof Booker's review did not include the equations critical to the predictions of the oscillating universe and, in any event, Booker's reviews are not in the form of Mathematica notebooks which, IMHO, is what is needed to overcome wide-spread skepticism-by-institutional-momentum, short of SunCell demonstrations under tightly controlled conditions.
What made things somewhat difficult for me (and perhaps Booker) is the fact that, for example, the equation for "aleph" (radius of the universe as a function of time), which is central to all that follows, is not given an equation number in the GUTCP book so I cannot easily cite the provenance for others to verify. It took some hunting to piece together the cosmological model with rigor adequate to execute as a Mathematica notebook.
This is all by way of asking others to critique if not help refine my effort to bring GUTCP's cosmology to the public in an impeccable form sufficient to overcome the aforementioned wide-spread skepticism-by-institutional-momentum .
Hi James, thanks for sharing your efforts to mathematically review Mills's cosmology. I am looking forward to seeing it widely discussed in astrophysics literature.
Hi Brett! I have been a “techie” for decades. Graduated from UC BERKELEY… Cal in 1963. But I had my first “HAM” radio license…Kn6BAJ in high school… 1957.
Designed and built my first radio equipment then.
Still fascinated by GUTCP… the *only* tech document I have found that explains pretty much *all* the sub-atomic “mysteries” that are still perplexing “advanced” physics.
Quantum mechanics is nonsense. )Modern physics has the *wrong* basic physical model.
Randy’s theory is correct, but it will not be accepted until he stops trying to build “just one more” laboratory model and actually designs and builds a real PRODUCT based on his theory.
I *modestly* suggest that he hire an *experienced* production engineer and offer him a gazillion dollars to design and build a system that actually works!
(Not me… At age 84… more interested in my upcoming tourist journey to Iceland than in earning a gazillion dollars.)
Decades ago, as a newly hatched BSEE from UC BERKELEY, I briefly considered continuing my education. But poverty and a lack of a high-enough grade point average dissuaded me. I found employment in Silicon Valley *before* they dug the Silicon mines. And I had a life that was both fiscally and intellectually rewarding.
But I have always remained doubtful about what was being taught in today’s schools.
Decades ago, I encountered the Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics… GUTCP… and actually read it… and kinda understood it! It made more sense than anything I had been taught in school.
It is fascinating… at age 84… to realize that I was prescient enough, as a kid, to read GUTCP and (mostly) understand it. But, perhaps regrettably, my career deviated when I learned that… as a technical marketer… I could get FREE lunches and dinners… with wine… while interfacing with customers that wanted to learn about my employer’s products. 😇
Thanks William for sharing your early interest in Mills's work. A side comment - if my calculations are right, you were a "kid" at age 54? Love the youthful exuberance of your curious mind!
Now in my 85th year. Still active… just returned from a trip to Antarctica. In a couple of months… off to Iceland and Greenland. Still fascinated by GUTCP!
Re… a hydrino product… Build *anything* and get it to work reliably.
Fun historical note… The first Steam engine was a device that could reliably pump water out of a coal (?) mine. A friend of the inventor noted that it would be very easy to convert the “back and forth” action of a pump TO the circular motion of a wheel.
My github repo (jaboweryGUTCP) see GUTCPCosmologicalModel.nb for my attempt at a Mathematica implementation of GUTCP cosmology. See also the numerous caveats given in the comment at the top. While my conclusions differ from those given in the book, the caveats should be more than adequate to demonstrate my intent is not to "debunk" GUTCP. Consider my effort a kind of "proof reading" by someone who may in fact not be qualified. But, in my own defense, AFAIK, this is the only publicly available review of GUTCP cosmology in a form that can be easily checked by anyone. Prof Booker's review did not include the equations critical to the predictions of the oscillating universe and, in any event, Booker's reviews are not in the form of Mathematica notebooks which, IMHO, is what is needed to overcome wide-spread skepticism-by-institutional-momentum, short of SunCell demonstrations under tightly controlled conditions.
What made things somewhat difficult for me (and perhaps Booker) is the fact that, for example, the equation for "aleph" (radius of the universe as a function of time), which is central to all that follows, is not given an equation number in the GUTCP book so I cannot easily cite the provenance for others to verify. It took some hunting to piece together the cosmological model with rigor adequate to execute as a Mathematica notebook.
This is all by way of asking others to critique if not help refine my effort to bring GUTCP's cosmology to the public in an impeccable form sufficient to overcome the aforementioned wide-spread skepticism-by-institutional-momentum .
Hi James, thanks for sharing your efforts to mathematically review Mills's cosmology. I am looking forward to seeing it widely discussed in astrophysics literature.
Hi Brett! I have been a “techie” for decades. Graduated from UC BERKELEY… Cal in 1963. But I had my first “HAM” radio license…Kn6BAJ in high school… 1957.
Designed and built my first radio equipment then.
Still fascinated by GUTCP… the *only* tech document I have found that explains pretty much *all* the sub-atomic “mysteries” that are still perplexing “advanced” physics.
Quantum mechanics is nonsense. )Modern physics has the *wrong* basic physical model.
Randy’s theory is correct, but it will not be accepted until he stops trying to build “just one more” laboratory model and actually designs and builds a real PRODUCT based on his theory.
I *modestly* suggest that he hire an *experienced* production engineer and offer him a gazillion dollars to design and build a system that actually works!
(Not me… At age 84… more interested in my upcoming tourist journey to Iceland than in earning a gazillion dollars.)
All the best! Bill
Decades ago, as a newly hatched BSEE from UC BERKELEY, I briefly considered continuing my education. But poverty and a lack of a high-enough grade point average dissuaded me. I found employment in Silicon Valley *before* they dug the Silicon mines. And I had a life that was both fiscally and intellectually rewarding.
But I have always remained doubtful about what was being taught in today’s schools.
Decades ago, I encountered the Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics… GUTCP… and actually read it… and kinda understood it! It made more sense than anything I had been taught in school.
It is fascinating… at age 84… to realize that I was prescient enough, as a kid, to read GUTCP and (mostly) understand it. But, perhaps regrettably, my career deviated when I learned that… as a technical marketer… I could get FREE lunches and dinners… with wine… while interfacing with customers that wanted to learn about my employer’s products. 😇
Thanks William for sharing your early interest in Mills's work. A side comment - if my calculations are right, you were a "kid" at age 54? Love the youthful exuberance of your curious mind!
Now in my 85th year. Still active… just returned from a trip to Antarctica. In a couple of months… off to Iceland and Greenland. Still fascinated by GUTCP!
Re… a hydrino product… Build *anything* and get it to work reliably.
Fun historical note… The first Steam engine was a device that could reliably pump water out of a coal (?) mine. A friend of the inventor noted that it would be very easy to convert the “back and forth” action of a pump TO the circular motion of a wheel.
The rest is history.
An acid trip is now once again needed in the coming months.
(Shit... I was taking all this Ukraine war stuff seriously again... My bad! ✋)
It does give perspective, doesn't it? And yes, I look forward to turning this into an IMAX documentary that you can trip out to, haha.