Great interview. I think that Mills theory will not be broadly accepted until commercialization unfortunately. I hope that he commercializes sometime in the near future so we can see rapid change for the world.
Yes, please do. I understand that Bruker performed analyses on 2 different EPRs and it confirmed his observations. Perhaps Dr. Hagen could obtain their results on letterhead?
If the transition between the molecular hydrino paramagnetic states is mediated by a neutrino, then why haven't we seen a neutrino transceiver yet? That seems like a straight forward way to force the issue. At present, direct manipulation/detection of neutrinos happens at the national lab scale (a close friend actually runs one such project so I'm aware of state of the art here). I'm guessing that a pocket scale neutrino transceiver would be difficult to handwave away.
Yes, according to Mills, since the hydrino molecular orbital has a spin of one-half, it may emit either a pair of photons or a neutrino in its rotational transitions. This may enable neutrino communication, but it will still require years of dedicated effort to bring to fruition. But fascinating nonetheless.
I feel like it could be a quick headshot that wipes out the skeptics. Doping a gallium substrate with molecular hydrino and demonstrate control over neutrino seems like a straight forward exercise.
Hi Ron. Ed Wall here. Intriguing suggestion, and I'm not qualified to speculate, but it seems like SQM theorists can dodge headshots like Neo in The Matrix.
This was really needed. Dr. Hagen agreed to discuss with the Yahoo discussion group after the first paper, and I knew from that he would be an excellent interviewee. Very fine job you have both done. The lack of interest in replication is a sad commentary on the present state of science. The evidence of hydrino from so many experiments and experimenters is staggering.
Perhaps Dr. Mills could be persuaded to do an interview to give his side of this work, particularly the derivation of the model that yields such excellent prediction of the EPR waveform.
Hagen is an eloquent speaker and courageous in his willingness to advocate for Mills. As for Mills, he has been willing to perform interviews in the past, you could follow up with him.
I choose to take it as a good sign that Mills didn't reply to my suggestion for the interview. He obviously has more pressing matters.
I was hoping to see some elaboration on the derivation of the model used to produce the simulation that matches the EPR results. However, given the disturbing incuriosity of the scientific community toward work that is easily verified and of such importance, I suppose clarification on the mathematical minutia borders on irrelevance, at this time.
Great interview. I think that Mills theory will not be broadly accepted until commercialization unfortunately. I hope that he commercializes sometime in the near future so we can see rapid change for the world.
Thanks Jonathan. We are all excited about what may happen this year.
Agree. There is no question that you have presented the extraordinary evidence. Time for the broader scientific community to take note.
Thanks Greg! I did take the EPR paper to another EPR expert in Seattle and he found the results very interesting. I may contact him again.
Yes, please do. I understand that Bruker performed analyses on 2 different EPRs and it confirmed his observations. Perhaps Dr. Hagen could obtain their results on letterhead?
Congrats Brett! This is an earth shattering interview!
Thanks Tom!
Nicely done Brett. Great interview!
If the transition between the molecular hydrino paramagnetic states is mediated by a neutrino, then why haven't we seen a neutrino transceiver yet? That seems like a straight forward way to force the issue. At present, direct manipulation/detection of neutrinos happens at the national lab scale (a close friend actually runs one such project so I'm aware of state of the art here). I'm guessing that a pocket scale neutrino transceiver would be difficult to handwave away.
Yes, according to Mills, since the hydrino molecular orbital has a spin of one-half, it may emit either a pair of photons or a neutrino in its rotational transitions. This may enable neutrino communication, but it will still require years of dedicated effort to bring to fruition. But fascinating nonetheless.
I feel like it could be a quick headshot that wipes out the skeptics. Doping a gallium substrate with molecular hydrino and demonstrate control over neutrino seems like a straight forward exercise.
Hi Ron. Ed Wall here. Intriguing suggestion, and I'm not qualified to speculate, but it seems like SQM theorists can dodge headshots like Neo in The Matrix.
This was really needed. Dr. Hagen agreed to discuss with the Yahoo discussion group after the first paper, and I knew from that he would be an excellent interviewee. Very fine job you have both done. The lack of interest in replication is a sad commentary on the present state of science. The evidence of hydrino from so many experiments and experimenters is staggering.
Perhaps Dr. Mills could be persuaded to do an interview to give his side of this work, particularly the derivation of the model that yields such excellent prediction of the EPR waveform.
Hagen is an eloquent speaker and courageous in his willingness to advocate for Mills. As for Mills, he has been willing to perform interviews in the past, you could follow up with him.
I choose to take it as a good sign that Mills didn't reply to my suggestion for the interview. He obviously has more pressing matters.
I was hoping to see some elaboration on the derivation of the model used to produce the simulation that matches the EPR results. However, given the disturbing incuriosity of the scientific community toward work that is easily verified and of such importance, I suppose clarification on the mathematical minutia borders on irrelevance, at this time.
Reddit group, not Yahoo.